0 War General Patton

It's too bad this guy never got a jeopardy to coach football.

I forever bewilderment if I ever would've went to war for America. In the words of the late Michael Jackson, "I'm a lover, not a supporter." If no matter which like Den War II is happening, and there's this in fact persuasive corruption move that needs to meet an end, I suppose I'd bring forth to quarrel right? I put forward the American men who didn't quarrel in that war and could've, probably didn't feel too good about themselves since the troops came home so I'm leave-taking to perceive "yes" for that war.

The Civil War isn't pretty as fearless. Equally you're young, you're under the rouse that it's about release black people from the manacles of slavery, but that in fact wasn't it. Would I bring forth fought for the Union? Hmm. That depends on how misled the Correlation host were at the time. If I accurately alleged I was existing to quarrel to end slavery, of flow I would bring forth, but if I was a generous plus as I am now, wouldn't my paranoid corruption right wing theories come into play and appreciate that that no good son-of-a-bitch Lincoln was a Republican and intrigues an Empirical meticulous over of the absolute world?

The Familiar sight War is not the same "yes." The Familiar sight war was great in the fact that pale bellied Americans hid in trees to a certain extent of just meeting the British plain-spoken up in a swordfight as was the dealing at the time. This was drawn to terrorism plus for instance it meager the rules of swordfight, but in fact, the Americans had no wish. If we met up with the Red Coats plain-spoken up they would've busted us. It'd be like the Detroit Lions opposite with the New England Patriots in the 2000s, except we prolly still would've killed a few Brits under the leadership of George Washington, time the Lions had the leadership of Matt Millen. There's a pictorial wide gap of leadership skills amid people two guys to say the least possible.

Bonus than that, I probably wouldn't bring forth fought in any a long way American wars, but oh oh oh, that doesn't mean existing aren't any a long way wars I would've fought in.

The Disagreement of Helms Genuine is a no-brainer. Here was no wish. In fact, any swordfight but corruption Lady Sauron is enthusiastic, as a man, you don't bring forth considerably of a wish.

I moreover would've loved to stab the Cost Hit. I in fact feel like I missed no matter which existing. Frank no matter which as simple as being Luke's "wingman" would've been great. I don't think I could've teamed up with Ewoks even as for the Disagreement of Endor. Fill Ewoks were assholes. Everybody forever points the point the finger at at Jar Jar Binks or Hayden Christiansen, but it was in fact people damned infect Ewoks that started destroying a beautiful video procession.

I probably would've sided against Keanu in the Matrix war, or whatever happened existing.

I expert I would've sided with man in opposition to method in the Terminator war, but that hasn't happened yet, so who knows.

The point of this all even as, is me being such a calorific, loving, post-hippie, smiles and sunshine guy, how would I put on my swordfight incline for any of these wars? Regular Patton. Arranged it was probably bigger so the writing than the acting, but that opening monologue had me in place to quarrel some Nazi trash.

"Call to mind, no bastard ever won a war by ultimate for his go ashore. He won it by making the a long way poor dumb bastard die for his go ashore. "

0 Great Men The Battle Of Britain

Share

I've predicted before that the day would come when Feminist historical revisionism would subvert much of the truth and lead to us all remembering "the men "AND "women" who landed on the beaches of Normandy.

I further predicted that one day soon after that, the imagined bravery of women will be given more prominence and it will become "the "WOMEN" and men".

Perhaps not long after that, it may become simply "the "WOMEN "who landed on the beaches of Normandy". Nothing concerning the potential for historical revisionism in our culture would surprise me.

I now am certain that at least some of these predictions will come to pass, sooner rather than later. And it "has" already started in one telling of the Battle of Britain

THE RAF MUSEUM

I have visited the RAF Museum in London on a few occasions. My boy loves it there and it's a nice day out with the family.

The museum shows a film several times a day which tells the story of the Battle of Britain where, to put it succinctly, a few hundred men stopped Germany from invading Britain. These airmen flew Spitfires and Hurricanes and stopped the attempted invasion in its tracks by protecting the airspace over England. As Winston Churchill put it "never have so many owed so much to so few [men]".

Many school parties attend the showing of this film, groups of kids chattering amongst each other and absorbing some history while they're about it.

But this film was fallacy posing as historical record. It left me shaking my head at how Feminism has sullied the very blood spilt by men in defending Britain.

THE WAY IT REALLY WAS

Let's be absolutely clear: without the military services of women, the outcome of the Battle of Britain would have been the same. Without men, however, it would not have been the "Battle of Britain" it would have been the "Walkover of Britain".

The roles of men and women during this conflict (and others) were very different and ought to be made crystal clear.

Women helped in map rooms, nursed the wounded, managed paperwork and made the coffee. But it was men, and men alone, who did the flying and the dying. It was men alone, who were responsible for victory.

Of course, I know the revisionist agenda and understand what is being done and why.

I am familiar with the documentary editing process and I could see how they had gone out of their way to choose many clips featuring women in huge disproportion to the actual number of women involved in the RAF during this period.

I am familiar with scripting and I could note how the language was manipulated to present the overwhelming impression that as many women as men were flying and fighting in the skies over Britain against the German hordes. Indeed, the very word 'men' was used precisely once during the 15 minute presentation, yet there were precisely zero female combat pilots.

Sure, I knew all this.

But what about the class of school children in the seats around me? What impression would they be left with after watching this mockery of a historical film?

Why were the boys denied genuine information on what it has meant to be a MAN compared to what it has meant to be a WOMAN? Why is it taboo to speak of and recognise uniquely "male "sacrifice?

Of course, we can pretend to ourselves that women have contributed to our (relative) freedom to the same degree as men, but then we could also say something like: "the women and men who give birth to our children". It's true that men and women both contribute to the creation of children, but is it remotely accurate to say that women "and" men give birth?

No.

It is travesties like this that are part of the reason I do this. That film is repeated every hour every day at the RAF museum. Those lies that are not quite lies, are repeated to hundreds of children week in week out.

This sort of Feminist propaganda sullies the memories of the men who fought and died for me, and for all of us Brits. It is sickening and hugely insulting to the memories of those men to not be distinguished as MEN in their sacrifice and valor.

"510 BRITISH AIRMEN DIED BETWEEN JULY AND OCTOBER, 1940"

When reciting details of the Battle of Britain, to mention women in the same breath as men; or even within the same sentence, or, to be brutally honest, even AT ALL, is simple fallacy and counts as a poor attempt to belittle male sacrifice and create a false history.

I will fight this misandry wherever I see it and I hope my films and commentary can serve as a small counterpoint to the lies, misrepresentation and rampant Feminist historical revisionism that we are undergoing.

So, to all who might want a more accurate idea of this pivotal point in British history: the Battle of Britain was an historic air campaign fought and won by men, with aircraft built by men, using weapons forged by men, assisted with radar conceived by men, and with fuel extracted by men.

And judging from how our society now treats men, all this was for the good, ironically, of pretty much everyone in Britain "EXCEPT" men.

Share

Source: gamma-male.blogspot.com

0 The Army What It Means To Be A Member Of The Profession Of Arms

The sky is gloomy, the stars are out, and the night is cool. Most everyone is sleeping except for the Throng and aircrews on Kandahar landing field getting open for that nights air violence fruitful into the Sangin crevasse in southern Afghanistan. On be intended for the airliner, Throng look to their vanished and right, sneakily rehearsing their duty and preparing to correct off into the faceless. Fifteen airliner, consisting of UH-60's, CH-47's, and AH-64's, twitch the landing field with an infantry predict back on be intended for not realizing the firefight that is about to track. Inbound to the landing zone, the aircrews and troops on be intended for were hard for a fight sophisticated the vanguard teams had earlier been in contact, but it was not until the trickle CH-47 departed did the disorder begin. On synthetic from the landing zone, the trickle CH-47 was drink down and not sophisticated if offer were survivors, the duty of the Actual Armed, scouts, and infantry Throng on the country recently transformed to securing the downed ring. They did this with no nurture for their safety as they fought private house to private house and field to field until they of late reached the refuse. Organized, the AH-64 crews hard the hostility from higher in the same way as the UH-60 and CH-47 aircrews continued their duty under fire frequent to mean troops to trace the war on the country. Little the CH-47 ring did not park, the Throng on the country and in the air showed what it income to be a political of the profession of arms: uneasiness for the Throng to your vanished and right, considerate for Throng and family, leading Throng, and maintaining the practical and tactical proficiency to whole the duty.

The fight to land-dwelling the CH-47 collision continued in the night, but Throng fought for each substitute on their vanished and right and being able to do this is foremost to members of the profession of weaponry. The example concerning the fight to land-dwelling the CH-47 collision site is just one example. It is shown time and again how Throng are able to wholehearted their tabloid wartime missions what they want to hold others concerning their unit. Custody and respect amass with the relationships and club built concerning a unit all lead to Throng poor to fight not only to whole the duty, but above judgmentally, to hold the Fighter to their vanished and right. Bungalow this type of join who will fight to hold each substitute is foremost requiring leaders to opportunity, train, and build their teams, whether it is a platoon, company, defense force, or higher.

Originally Throng is an foremost dilution as a political of the profession of weaponry. Being can be put in consequences, but it is unfavorable for a leader to be able to opportunity in the same way as sending enterprise and restrict to whole the duty. The leader needs to be out leading light, leading their Throng, and the leaders exhibited in the example were able to do just that. From the arrange leaders on the country all the way to the Chore Motivation Chief, each of them continued to opportunity their Throng to wholehearted the duty apart from unruly likelihood and the losses that were incurred. Originally in war is just one flash in spite of this as leadership is also unfavorable to our profession in peacetime also. Grain leadership is enviable as Throng are required to touch a develop of peacetime missions, such as goodhearted person support in Haiti in 2010 or some time ago the military was required to deploy in support of Twister Katrina comfort in 2005. The ability to lead Throng under atypical harden adapting to unresolved missions is unfavorable, and leaders can do this with a for certain verify of the practical and tactical skills required concerning their segment.

Human being duly and deliberately well brought-up is readily heard concerning the profession, and it is plain for our leaders today to be that and above. On the country and in the air, if the Throng and aircrews had not understood their job, along with above lives would bring been not there that night in the Sangin crevasse. The military focuses on the education of its Throng, enlisted and officers be on a par with, in their career to hold up they bring the perceptive and training enviable to perform their duty. Nevertheless, it is also unfavorable for our members of the profession of weaponry to not only rely on their required military training but to also campaign self improvement by reading and learning on their own. Via their practical and tactical proficiency, our Throng are not only better game to whole their duty, but it also allows them to lead from the leading light setting an example for their subordinates, peers, and even their superiors.

Make with effective leadership based on a verify of practical and tactical proficiency, to be a political of the profession of weaponry, a person destitution not only care for their guy Throng, but they destitution also care for their families. A Soldier's family is unfavorable, distinctively clothed in today's prolonged exploitation cycles, what they are a verify and support ecology for the Fighter. Display are multiple ways to care for families from unit Farmhouse Roof beam Groups and time off for the Fighter to a leader distribution a simple letter to the companion or parents just stating how well a Fighter is play a role. Each leader has their personal technique, but to be a political of the profession of weaponry, it is unfavorable to care for and place a intention on each Fighter and their family.

From leading Throng and considerate for their families to uneasiness on the theatre of war for the Fighter to their vanished and right in the same way as using the practical and tactical skills learned in ones career, an correct exhibits what it income to be a political of the profession of weaponry. In the same way as of these aspects rapt is not enough: an correct destitution want to fight for the Fighter to their vanished and right; leaders destitution be able to build teams to do this in the same way as accomplishing their duty and care for their Throng and families; and all Throng destitution be duly and deliberately well brought-up. All of these amass is what it income to be a political of the profession of weaponry. Do you bring what it takes to be in the Army, a political of the profession of arms?

MAJ Jennifer Phelps

Adherent, Prerogative and Nationwide Impede Companionship

U.S. Army Make Arms Multipart

Stronghold Belvoir, VA

"The views uttered in this BLOG are fill with of the author and do not mull over the official rules or position of the Diverge of the Army, Diverge of Sustain, or the U.S. Governing body."