Tuesday, December 2, 2008

0 Flirting With Disaster

Flirting With Disaster
"You're such a flirt" is everything that I've heard numerous times gulp down out my life. I usually just shrug my shoulders and say, "I'm just engaging. It's totally innocuous." I never reflection that award was anything erroneous with flirting, until I read this research article by David Henningsen (2004) entitled, "Flirting with meaning: An consider of miscommunication in flirting exchanges." As we all say to, miscommunication (about anything) can lead to numerous problems together with frustration, arguments, mistakes, and the like. As this study shows, flirting is no exception, carriage speckled messages surrounded by the sexes.

Henningsen (2004) examined 200 participants' responses about flirting exchanges. Participants were each prone images of six established motivations for flirting, which included, relational, fun, sexual, exploring, pace, and instrumental, and asked to contract these motivations to reliable flirting behaviors. Desperately few behaviors were proven as having instrumental (i.e. flirting to get everything from the far away person) or pace (i.e. flirting to nurture your own drive) motivations, so they were not analyzed. Too, award were no downright differences surrounded by how men and women certified flirting behaviors to exploring (or assessing whether newborn person is curious in you).

So, what did Henningsen (2004) discover?

1. Men certified sexual motivations to flirting chief than women did.2. Women certified relational (or flirting to intensify a relationship) and fun (or flirting at the same time as it is an moral form of interaction) motivations to flirting chief than men did.

Seeing that does all of this mean?Basically, since women are flirting (or see organization besides flirting), they sustain (or think others sustain) the intentions of having fun or going up the relationship that they sustain with the person they are flirting with. On the far away worker, men sustain (or think others sustain) the intentions of inadequate to get it on. This create of error may possibly be bounty disastrous!

So, the real question is: Could do with women only flirt since they are sexually curious in newborn person (so that men don't get hectic) or basic men undivided that flirtatious women are not ad infinitum trying to get in their pants? I'll look into this one up to you.

Reference:


* Henningsen, D. D. (2004). Flirting with meaning: An consider of miscommunication in flirting exchanges. Sex Roles, 50, 481-489.

For chief information about flirting and miscommunication surrounded by the sexes, see the instant research articles:

* Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for engaging behavior: Do males misperceive female friendliness? Periodical of Moral fiber and Companionable Psychology, 42, 830-838.
* Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of engaging deportment as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173-194.
* Beck, S., Clabaugh, S. E., Clark, R. A., et al. (2007). Josh including college men and women. Take notice of Studies, 58, 157-172.

* O'Farrell, K. J., Rosenthal, E. N., ">Journal of Companionable and Discrete Relatives, 20, 663-674.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

 

Dating for Average Guys Copyright © 2011 - |- Template created by O Pregador - |- Powered by Blogger Templates