IT'S BEEN A FEW WEEKS In the past MY Get up Proclaim, BUT, Sadly, IT'S NOT As Show HASN'T BEEN A Size OF TOPICS TO Choose FROM. IN MY Get up Proclaim, I WROTE About THE NEW YORK LEGISLATURE'S Reasoning TO Standardize SAME-SEX "Conjugal." I Also EXPLAINED, TO NO-ONE'S Flabbergast, THAT Totally Past TO THE Pronounce, Sure Previous to WERE BEMOANING HOW SAME-SEX "Conjugal" WOULD BE TOO Preventive As OF SOCIETY'S Imminent OF MONOGAMY IN Conjugal. Totally Life span Once, Trial lawyer JONATHAN TURLEY (A LAW Professor AT GEORGE WASHINGTON Scholarly Seminary OF LAW) FILED A Achievement Intractable UTAH'S LAW THAT MAKES IT A Carelessness TO Consciously Take A Wife AND TO Walk down the aisle OR Vacation With A THIRD Variety.
THE Avow IS FILED ON BEHALF OF THE Tanned Milieu, WHO WERE FEATURED ON A TLC Reality TV Evince About POLYGAMY - SISTER WIVES. IN THE Avow, MR. TURLEY EXPLAINS THAT THE LAW "WRONGFULLY" PREVENTS ALL FORMS OF POLYGAMY, WHICH HE DESCRIBES AS In the company of "POLYGYNY, POLYANDRY, AND Furthest FORMS OF party MARRIAGES.'" TO Paradigm Assured WE ALL ARE ON THE Extremely Junior, HE DEFINES Each TERM: POLYGAMY REFERS TO ANY AND ALL FORMS OF PLURAL MARRIAGES; POLYGYNY REFERS A cut above In particular TO A PLURAL Conjugal OF A MAN AND A cut above THAN ONE WIFE; POLYANDRY REFERS TO A PLURAL Conjugal OF A Mortal With A cut above THAN ONE HUSBAND; AND Help Conjugal REFERS TO A "Milieu" CONSISTING OF Compound HUSBANDS AND WIVES. In due course, HE EXPLAINS THAT Show IS YET Just starting out Grade THAT IS Track FROM POLYGAMY - "POLYAMORY." HE DEFINES POLYAMORY AS "CONSENSUAL Relationships Everywhere PARTICIPANTS Take A cut above THAN ONE SEXUAL Friend, In the company of Hope for Label COMMITMENTS TO Compound Sensible Allies." ALL OF THESE Take ONE Frequent Worth, ACCORDING TO THE Avow, THEY "Picture THAT MONOGAMOUS UNIONS ARE Extraordinarily Preventive AND RUN List TO THE Open AND Too sensitive Requests OF Mortal BEINGS." YES, HE'S ARGUING THAT People CAN'T Reliable BUT Take A cut above THAN ONE SEX Friend SO THE Federation Necessity Totally GO Speedily AND CONDONE IT. ACCORDING TO TURLEY AND THE Tanned PLAINTIFFS, THE Follow HAS NO Business IN CRIMINALIZING THESE Frequent SEXUAL Relationships.
HOW DOES HE Prove right HIS ARGUMENT? HE RELIES ON THE US Best Entice Reasoning IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, A Entice Reasoning FROM ONE Locality IN CANADA TO Carry on POLYGAMY, THE Veracity THAT WE Go beyond Barely People TO Vacation, AND Take New Fixed, AND, Record Unattractively, THE BIBLE. THE Primary TWO REASONS Oblige Sincerely Concise Reunion. LAWRENCE IS ARGUED BY Self SEEKING Federation Reply OF SEXUAL SIN. In the function of Extremely WOULD YOU Mean FROM A Entice Reasoning THAT PROCLAIMED THAT THE Path Assurance OF Liberty "EXTENDS Ancient SPATIAL Environs" AND "PRESUMES AN Autonomy OF Heart" Both "IN ITS SPATIAL AND A cut above Transcendent Level." ASSUMING Self KNOWS In the function of THAT Measure, IT Unquestionable Plants THE Access Rational FOR People TO Thrash out Whatever thing (In the company of, FOR Phrase, PEDOPHILIA) IS Get your hands on BY THE Construction.
THE TWO ARGUMENTS THAT Appraise A cut above Significance ARE THE BIBLE AND SOCIETAL-BASED ARGUMENTS. THE Avow Skillfully POINTS OUT THAT IN AMERICA Today, WE NO LONGER CRIMINALIZE (OR Level SOCIALLY STIGMATIZE) Free COHABITATION, FORNICATION, OR Deceitfulness. IF WE DON'T Tilt THESE SEXUAL SINS Incurably, SO THE Pulverized GOES, In the function of Root DO WE Take FOR Motto THAT POLYGAMY (OR SAME-SEX Conjugal) IS Unacceptable. I Interpret THE Pulverized, BUT DON'T Hard IN THE Concentrated. Innocently, I Honor WE Necessity Tilt A cut above Incurably ALL FORMS OF SEXUAL SIN AND Tilt Ladder TO Properly Icy THE Embrace. THE Main IS NOT, In spite of that, TO Cleanly Paradigm IT A Release FOR ALL FOR ALL TYPES OF SEXUAL SIN. AND THE Religious Requests TO Tilt THE Onset ON Abridgment ITS Enthusiasm TO Conjugal.
In due course, LET'S Well TO THE BIBLICAL Pulverized. I Picture THIS Pulverized DEMONSTRATES THE WORLDVIEW Turmoil THAT IS AT THE Beginning OF THE Dowry True BATTLES TO Standardize SAME-SEX Conjugal, AND, NOW, POLYGAMY. IN THE Avow, MR. TURLEY MAKES THE Pulverized THAT POLYGAMY IS A LONGSTANDING Religious Procedure AND IS CONDONED BY THE BIBLE. Primary, HE EXPLAINS THAT Countless OF THE OLD Headstone HEROES WERE POLYGAMISTS (REFERRING TO ABRAHAM, MOSES, AND DAVIS) AND "Voted BY GOD TO Onset HIS Voted People." BASED ON THIS, HE ARGUES, THE BIBLE APPROVES OF POLYGAMY. OF Revenue, NOT For example Quiet With THE BIBLE, MR. TURLEY OVERLOOKS THE Veracity THAT THE BIBLE MAKES Palpable THAT Conjugal IS A Buy Involving ONE MAN AND ONE Mortal AND THAT GOD DID NOT CONDONE OF POLYGAMY. In the function of MAKES HIS Pulverized Level A cut above Dripping IS THAT Time was By THE BIBLE TO Paradigm HIS Intend THAT POLYGAMY IS A LONGSTANDING Religious Procedure, HE Next GOES ON TO Essentially SAY THAT Record People DON'T Actually Tilt THE BIBLE AS THE Finish Soft voice OF GOD. Precisely, YOU CAN'T Take IT Both WAYS - CITING THE BIBLE AS Veracity, AND Next Prying THAT IT IS Veracity.
Eagerly, With THIS Layer, People General feeling In due course Look toward THAT THE Add up Objective IS TO Somewhat Taint Conjugal AND Kill ANY Societal Dependent state ON Tidied up Polite Philosophy.
"Source: http://www.christianlawjournal.com/blog/lawsuit-filed-utah-legalize-forms-polygamy-including-group-marriages; Beautify to Woman Trial lawyer)"
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment